CHRONOS by MacKenzie

CHRONOS by MacKenzie

Share this post

CHRONOS by MacKenzie
CHRONOS by MacKenzie
The Issue with the Peer-Review System
In Hindsight

The Issue with the Peer-Review System

The FDA's Flawed Lab Mice

MacKenzie's avatar
MacKenzie
Jul 06, 2024
∙ Paid
4

Share this post

CHRONOS by MacKenzie
CHRONOS by MacKenzie
The Issue with the Peer-Review System
2
Share

In a thought-provoking discussion, evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein sheds light on a critical issue within scientific research: the use of genetically identical lab mice. This practice, as Weinstein argues, introduces significant biases, leading to unreliable results and potentially hindering the development of effective treatments and cures for various diseases. This problem, often overlooked, is pivotal for both the scientific community and the general public.

Weinstein, during his graduate studies in evolutionary biology, was captivated by the evolutionary trade-offs outlined by George Williams in his seminal work on senescence—the process by which organisms age. Williams’ theory of antagonistic pleiotropy posits that certain genes beneficial in early life can have detrimental effects in later life. This concept intrigued Weinstein, particularly in its application to the understanding of aging and disease.

Weinstein's curiosity led him to investigate telomeres—repetitive DNA seq…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to CHRONOS by MacKenzie to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Sami MacKenzie-Kerr
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share