The 2005 Chloroquine is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread Conspiracy Theory published by the NIH
April 16, 2020 — a date which will live in infamy—the United States of America & the World was Suddenly and Deliberately Attacked - Clear & Present Danger
In the unfolding drama of the global pandemic, we embark on a chronological expedition, navigating through a series of events, decisions, and shifts in perspective that have shaped the response to the COVID-19 crisis.
Our story commences on February 15, as Fauci downplays the gravity of the emerging virus, dismissing it as a minor concern. This initial tone-setting moment lays the groundwork for the unfolding narrative.
A pivotal scene emerges on February 25 as a distinguished virologist, Didier Raoult, strides onto the stage, boldly proclaiming success in treating the virus with hydroxychloroquine. This declaration, rooted in a study conducted in China, introduces a potential solution to the crisis.
The plot takes an unexpected turn on March 6 when New York Governor Andrew Cuomo makes a consequential decision, prohibiting the use of hydroxychloroquine in the state. This unforeseen development raises intriguing questions about the effectiveness of the intervention.
As the narrative progresses, our central figure, Anthony Fauci, undergoes a transformation in stance on March 7-8, recognizing the escalating gravity of the situation. The narrative arc shifts, and on March 16, a global leader, President Donald Trump, implements precautionary measures to curb the spread of the virus.
In a climactic scene on March 20, President Trump challenges established authorities, advocating for the availability of hydroxychloroquine despite regulatory hesitations. This clash sets the stage for a high-stakes confrontation with far-reaching consequences.
A subplot emerges on March 22, featuring a local practitioner, Dr. Zelenko, claiming success in treating a substantial number of patients with hydroxychloroquine, boasting a success rate north of 90%. This subplot injects an element of hope and achievement amid the broader uncertainty.
In a subsequent chapter on April 9, Anthony Fauci reappears, initiating a study on hydroxychloroquine after Raoult and Zelenko have already taken their bows. This delayed response raises questions about the timing of the decision and its impact on the overall narrative.
"And I have one last thing to show you. My most spectacular attempt to actually give you this inconvenient truth, which is stated as follows. If we take this scale and go back, back, back, back, back, back, back, back. What we find here in 2005. But let's be reasonable, if I had the right illumination, I would have exited this building and crossed the street, compared to this graph where Fauci waited more than eight weeks or roughly eight weeks from the moment Didier Raoult said that chloroquine works.
In 2005, the NIH, where Anthony Fauci has been working since the 1980s, funded a study on hydroxychloroquine against the SARS coronavirus. This study is here. And if I read you the conclusion, it says: 'Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in cell culture, a favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when cells were- treated with chloroquine before or after infection with SARS-CoV-2.' This is huge, which means that in 2005, studies had already been conducted showing that this treatment could be effective, and the study even mentions the fact that SARS-CoV-2 attached to ACE 2, in the same way we observe it with this COVID-19."
EPISODE 159 - LOCKDOWN SHOWDOWN - April 16, 2020
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread
- August 2005
Conclusion: Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.
Don’t fall for conspiracy about Dr. Anthony Fauci, hydroxychloroquine
- May 2020
Chloroquine/SARS study does not prove hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness against COVID-19
- August 2020
A Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine as Postexposure Prophylaxis for Covid-19
- June 2020
Key moments from mid-February to April
February 15:
Anthony Fauci, a prominent figure in the fight against COVID-19, minimizes the significance of the virus, referring to it as a "tiny" problem.
February 25:
Renowned French virologist Didier Raoult asserts success in treating COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine. His claim is based on a study conducted in China, suggesting the virus is not only treatable but also one of the easiest to manage.
March 6:
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo takes an unexpected step by prohibiting the use of hydroxychloroquine in the state, a decision that raises questions about the treatment's efficacy.
March 7-8:
Fauci changes his stance, acknowledging that the situation is evolving from a minor issue to a serious concern, marking a shift in the perceived severity of the pandemic.
March 16:
President Donald Trump initiates social distancing measures as a precautionary step to curb the spread of the virus.
March 20:
Trump engages in a public disagreement with the FDA, urging the agency to grant compassionate use of chloroquine despite its absence from coronavirus labeling. This move underscores the urgency felt at the highest levels of government.
March 22:
Dr. Zelenko in New York reports remarkable success in treating hundreds of COVID-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine, claiming a success rate exceeding 90%.
April 9:
Fauci initiates a study on hydroxychloroquine, signaling a delayed response compared to earlier claims by Raoult and Zelenko.
"Si chaque instinct que tu as est erroné, alors l'opposé devrait être correct."