Previously on The Architecture of the Pandemic

Subscribe now

Read more

Previously on The Architecture of the Pandemic

In Arc 1 we examined the suppression of early treatment protocols, the discrediting of repurposed drugs, and the institutional machinery that shaped the official narrative. We saw how certain scientific voices were elevated while others were marginalized.

Now we turn to the economic and financial structures that made this possible. Because behind every policy choice, every trial design, every regulatory decision, there is money. Contracts. Stock prices. Lobbying expenditures. Share buybacks. Liability shields. Advance purchase agreements.

“This is not conspiracy. This is architecture.”

Subscribe now

Between 2020 and 2022, a small group of companies, notably Gilead Sciences, Pfizer (in partnership with BioNTech), and Moderna, received unprecedented government funding, legal protections, and accelerated regulatory pathways. These mechanisms created extraordinary asymmetric upside: massive revenue concentration, explosive stock-price movements tied to announcements, and windfall profits that were later partially returned to shareholders via buybacks and dividends rather than broad R&D diversification.

Meanwhile, cheap, off-patent early treatments faced regulatory hurdles, negative trial framing, and institutional resistance.

In hindsight, the pattern is clear: policy did not merely respond to the virus, it actively shaped a market in which certain pharmaceutical products enjoyed de-risked, government-backed profitability while alternatives were sidelined.

Corporate Foresight Beyond Pharma

The financial architecture extended into supply chains and predictive analytics. As early as January 2020, Amazon leveraging sophisticated AI algorithms analyzing historical trends, consumer behavior, and emerging health signals, proactively preordered facial masks and fortified its supply chain in partnership with McKinsey & Company. This enabled rapid stocking of fulfillment centers while the company enforced pricing policies against gouging.

With the benefit of hindsight, this operational agility stands in contrast to the institutional sidelining of repurposed early treatments (such as hydroxychloroquine + zinc prophylaxis, referenced in earlier studies including Baric 2010 on zinc ionophores). It raises legitimate questions about the $cience vs. Profit conundrum.

(Full exploration: How Amazon & McKinsey Utilized AI Predictive Capabilities to Preorder Masks During the Covid-19 Pandemic.)

Early COVID-19 vaccine allocation disparities — rich countries secured massive pre-orders while low-income nations faced shortages (Oxfam / NYT context).

The mRNA Billionaire Payday

This architecture produced striking personal windfalls. As detailed in the People’s Vaccine Alliance report, COVID vaccines created at least nine new billionaires with a combined net wealth of $19.3 billion, enough to fully vaccinate everyone in low-income countries more than once. This figure exceeded the cost of vaccinating the world’s poorest nations at the time, even as those countries received only a tiny fraction of global supply.

The list is dominated by Moderna and BioNTech executives and early investors (many of whom benefited despite heavy taxpayer funding for development): Stéphane Bancel (Moderna CEO), Albert Bourla (Pfizer CEO), and Uğur Şahin (BioNTech CEO & co-founder).

Pfizergate offers a striking illustration of the opacity at the highest levels. In early 2021, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen personally negotiated massive vaccine contracts with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla via private text messages and calls. The resulting deal covered up to 1.8 billion doses for approximately €35 billion, the largest vaccine procurement in EU history. When journalists and investigators sought access to these messages under transparency rules, the Commission claimed they no longer existed or could not be found, triggering years of legal battles, Ombudsman complaints, and court rulings against the Commission for lack of plausible explanation. In hindsight, this episode underscores the questions of accountability, information flow, and potential conflicts in the government–pharma nexus.

(Full post: SARS ORIGINS – Nine New Vaccine Billionaires. Original Oxfam report: COVID vaccines create 9 new billionaires.)

Moderna (MRNA) stock performance showing the dramatic pandemic-era surge tied to contracts and EUAs.

Philanthrocapitalism: Gates’ Strategic Investments & Media Influence

The financial architecture also involved high-profile private investors. Bill Gates’ foundation made a pre-IPO equity investment of $55 million in BioNTech (Pfizer’s mRNA partner). In under two years, this blossomed into more than $550 million as the company’s valuation soared on vaccine contracts and EUAs.

Simultaneously, the Gates Foundation directed over $319 million in grants to major media outlets and journalism programs, including NBC, PBS, The Atlantic, The Guardian, Le Monde, BBC, NPR, and investigative centers such as the Pulitzer Center. These funds supported reporting on global health, gender equality, and pandemic-related topics.

Looking back at it, the intersection of substantial equity stakes in mRNA companies and extensive media funding raises profound questions about narrative influence, journalistic independence, and the blurred lines between philanthropy, investment returns, and public discourse.

(Full CHRONOS analysis: Bill Gates Pre-IPO Gamble turns $55 Million Investment in BioNTech. See also: The Grayzone on Gates media funding and TechStartups on the BioNTech investment return.)

The Master Timeline: Policy, Contracts, Approvals, and Markets

Below is the master timeline that will guide the rest of Arc 2. It overlays key policy and regulatory events against the stock performance of Gilead (GILD), Pfizer (PFE), Moderna (MRNA), BioNTech (BNTX), and a broader biotech/pharma index for context.

Pandemic Policy, Contracts & Approvals vs. Big Pharma Stock Performance (2020–2026). GILD (blue), MRNA (orange), PFE (green), BNTX (yellow). Indexed percentage change. Note the violent surges on announcements, contracts, and EUAs — especially the mRNA rocket ships — against Gilead’s more muted ride. Data: TradingView.

Key markers include:

• December 30, 2019 → Chinese eye doctor reports unusual cluster of atypical pneumonia cases.

• January 5, 2020 → WHO announces 44 cases of atypical pneumonia of unknown cause in Wuhan (population 8 million).

• January 9, 2020 → First PCR test kits for the novel virus are already being manufactured and shipped.

• January 11, 2020 → First gene sequence of the virus is published on the same day PCR kits begin global distribution.

• January 22, 2020 → WHO adopts a PCR protocol as the “gold standard” for testing.

• February 1, 2020 → Corman-Drosten PCR protocol is submitted, peer-reviewed, and published in record time.

• February 6, 2020 → Chinese study detailing clinical symptoms of COVID-19 published in New England Journal of Medicine.

• February 11, 2020 → First study on asymptomatic transmission published in New England Journal of Medicine.

• Mid-March 2020 → Widespread U.S. lockdowns and stay-at-home orders begin.

• March 17, 2020 → Publication of “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2”.

• April 29, 2020 → Fauci declares Remdesivir the new standard of care.

• March 10, 2020 → PREP Act liability shield declaration

• May 1, 2020 → Remdesivir EUA

• May 15, 2020 → Operation Warp Speed announced

• July–August 2020 → Major advance purchase agreements (Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna)

• November–December 2020 → Positive trial announcements and EUAs for mRNA vaccines

• 2021–2022 → Peak rollout, mandates, and record revenues

• 2023–2026 → Post-pandemic normalization, revenue cliffs, and continued buyback activity

What This Arc Will Examine

In the coming weeks we are going to rip the lid off this goddamn thing company by company, like a pack of rabid wolves tearing into the soft underbelly of the beast.

Gilead & Remdesivir → We will take the 2024 LancetGate autopsy and drag it screaming into 2020–2026, ripping open the full financials, the lobbying spikes that smelled like pure corruption, the obscene pricing, and those grotesque stock-price coincidences that make any thinking man reach for the whiskey and a loaded revolver.

Source: FranceSoir-Gilead (GILD) stock chart (2020) showing announcement-driven volatility around Remdesivir

Pfizer + BioNTech → The largest government contracts in human history, the obscene revenue concentration, and the black-art financial engineering that followed, a masterclass in legalized plunder.

Moderna → That pure-play mRNA rocket ship, the one that went from near-bankruptcy to multi-billion-dollar valuations and back again, riding the wave of taxpayer money like a degenerate gambler on the mother of all hot streaks.

Every deep dive will be merciless: detailed cash-flow reformulations that smell like cooked books, revenue breakdowns, buyback programs that reek of insider enrichment, lobbying data that would make a Tammany Hall ward boss blush, and stock-event overlays so blatant they look like insider trading with the volume turned up to eleven. Full source packs, raw tables, and downloadable spreadsheets will be available exclusively for paid subscribers, because the truth isn’t free, and neither is the ammunition you’ll need for this fight.

The Questions That Remain

How in the name of all that is unholy did liability protections and advance purchase agreements warp corporate risk calculations into a license to print money with zero downside?

To what extent did government funding and EUA pathways turn normal market discipline into a goddamn joke?

And why, sweet Jesus, why did certain products rocket straight into global protocols while cheap, off-patent early treatments were systematically kneecapped, demonized, and buried in the desert?

These are not polite questions. These are the kind of questions that get you labeled a dangerous lunatic in polite society. But they are the only questions worth asking if we want to understand the true architecture that governed this pandemic, the machinery, the money, the fix that was in from the very beginning.

The devil, as always, remains in the detail and the annexes, my friends. The annexes are where the bodies are buried.

We begin the deep dive with Gilead in the next post.

Read more

Previously on The Architecture of the Pandemic

We have traced the architecture of the 2020–2023 response through this series. It began with Professor Didier Raoult’s recognition of effective treatments, after receiving a Chinese paper showing that HCQ + Azithromycin was more effective against SARS-CoV-2 than Remdesivir in direct comparison. It continued with the narrative war that crushed early outpatient protocols from Raoult and Dr. Zev Zelenko. We examined how high-cycle PCR and weaponized fear manufactured the metrics of crisis. We saw Zelenko adapt the very mechanism Baric had published a decade earlier.

Subscribe now

There’s a man at the center of this machine, and once you start pulling threads, his name keeps appearing no matter which direction you follow. Ralph Baric. UNC Chapel Hill. Forty years inside coronavirus research. The guy who understood how to engineer these viruses, how to make them look like they came from nature, and how to have pieces of the response already positioned before most people even knew there was a problem.

This was never just one scientist working in isolation. This was a system that kept feeding him grants, collaborations, and institutional protection while the same small circle of interests kept orbiting the crisis they later claimed caught them off guard.

2006: They Already Knew How to Fake the Origin Story

Back in 2006, Baric published a paper that should have triggered more serious scrutiny. He described how synthetic biology and seamless genome assembly could be used to construct viruses digitally, viruses that could be engineered to carry the exact genetic signature of whatever strain you wanted them to resemble. He called one version of this the “scapegoat” option.

“Synthetic viral genomes can be designed to be identical with exact virus strains circulating in any given location from any year. This powerful technique provides the bioterrorist with a ‘scapegoat’ option; leaving a sequence signature that misdirects efforts at tracking the true originators of the crime.”

He wasn’t speaking abstractly. He noted that this kind of engineered misdirection could be used to build mistrust between nations or even help precipitate open warfare. He put it in writing and kept working.

Jon Fleetwood has done some of the clearest reporting on this paper:

JonFleetwood.com

2006 Ralph Baric Paper Describes Synthetic 'Scapegoat' Viruses Engineered Digitally With False Origin 'Fingerprints' to Mislead Investigators

A 2006 paper authored by Dr. Ralph Baric—the University of North Carolina virologist widely recognized as the leading architect of chimeric coronavirus genomes and in silico viral assembly techniques—openly describes how synthetic viral genomics could be used to create viruses digitally, containing misleading genetic “fingerprints” designed to redirect …

Read more

2 months ago · 83 likes · 17 comments · Jon Fleetwood

2010: The Cheap Kill Switch Nobody Wanted to Fund

Four years later, Baric co-authored research that pointed toward a genuinely disruptive possibility. In PLoS Pathogens, he and his colleagues demonstrated that zinc, when delivered into cells using an appropriate ionophore, could inhibit the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), the core enzyme that virtually all RNA viruses use to replicate and spread.

This wasn’t fringe work. RdRP is the replication engine for coronaviruses and many other RNA viruses. The paper showed that increasing intracellular zinc levels could block that engine in cell culture. The approach was relatively simple and inexpensive. It didn’t require inventing a brand-new patented molecule.

Dr. Zev Zelenko later read this research and built a clinical protocol around it, zinc plus an ionophore, given early to high-risk patients. He reported sharp reductions in hospitalizations. The connection between Baric’s laboratory findings and real-world early treatment was later traced by others who spent years following the thread.

Yet the system never gave this approach serious institutional support. There were no large, well-funded follow-up trials pushed at the scale later seen with other interventions. It remained, for the most part, an orphan discovery. Natural compounds and repurposed mechanisms are difficult to patent and monetize at pharmaceutical scale. The incentives in the system do not reward cheap, early, outpatient solutions the same way they reward new patented drugs that can be administered under emergency authorization in hospitals.

Baric had published a potential off-switch years earlier. It was largely treated as background noise.

"Zinc is able to effectively block virus RDRP (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) replication of RNA... It is critical for zinc to be able [to] enter cells to destroy the virus, which makes the discovery of an ionophore as important as zinc’s primary role in infection control. Hydroxychloroquine... has far reaching abilities for distribution throughout the human body, including entering cells."

2015: The Intelligence Crowd Shows Up

This is where the story starts to smell like something more than pure academic research.

In September 2015, emails later released by Senator Rand Paul showed that Dr. Ralph Baric was contacted by officials from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) about a “possible project” on coronavirus evolution and possible natural human adaptation.

Read more

Subscribe now

There he is, right there in the car, beard wild, eyes burning like he’s staring straight through the windshield into the black heart of the whole rotten operation. One of his last major transmissions from 2022, two minutes and forty-seven seconds of pure, uncut truth and the bastards are still losing their minds over it in 2026. Hantavirus. Single-stranded RNA. The same goddamn family as the thing they tried to sell us as the end of the world. Zev just sits there calm as a bomb and drops the hammer: his protocol works on it too. Cheap. Oral. No hospital. No ventilator. No body bags stacking up like cordwood.

“Hi, good morning. This is Dr. Zelenko. I'd like to give you a biology lesson.

There are many viruses in the world and we categorize them based on their genetic material. And so there's this class of viruses called single-stranded RNA viruses.

And some of those viruses include all the COVID strains, Covid-19, influenza virus, RSV virus, Marburg virus, Ebola virus, Hantavirus, and there are a few others.

The point being is that they're single-stranded RNA viruses that use this same common pathway in making copies of their genetic material. That's something called RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.

That's what I've been talking about for the last two years in a context of COVID-19. But if we extrapolate that to think more broadly, then it is this same mechanism of treatment using zinc ionophores and zinc could inhibit all those strains of Covid-19, influenza virus, RSV virus, Ebola virus, Marburg virus, and Hantavirus.

This has a tremendous amount of national security implications, and I don't think anyone realizes this. So I'm pleading with our scientists, the honest people in the government, to investigate these.

Because as recent chatter in the news is going, we're seeing hemorrhagic fever from China, this concern about Marburg virus, Hantavirus, and Ebola virus. These viruses carry, you know, to some estimates 90% death rates.

So I think there may be a solution to all these huge public health and bioterrorist problems, all with one simple, cheap oral approach. Basically what I'm saying is if the whole world had enough vitamin D3, high normal levels of vitamin D3, and enough intracellular zinc, we can eradicate most of these health threats.

Thank you and God bless you.”

And here is why:

“Zinc is able to effectively block virus RDRP (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) replication of RNA... It is critical for zinc to be able to enter cells to destroy the virus, which makes the discovery of an ionophore as important as zinc’s primary role in infection control. Hydroxychloroquine... has far reaching abilities for distribution throughout the human body, including entering cells.”

I was there when the pieces finally slammed together for him. Not in the room, but close enough through rabbis and late-night wires and the kind of underground railroad that only forms when the machine is trying to crush a man for telling the truth. Zev Zelenko wasn’t some lab-coated suit in a glass tower. He was a Hasidic family doctor in Monroe, New York, already missing a lung to cancer, watching his people die in real time while the suits in Davos and Bethesda counted their future vaccine profits.

March 12, 2020. Middle of the night. Sleep won’t come. He’s lying there in prayer and meditation, begging for something, anything to throw at the beast tearing through his patients. Checks his email. Boom. A link to MedCram Update #34 drops like manna from the sky. Dr. Roger Seheult laying out the science. Zev reads it and knows, right then, that God just handed him the sword.

From his memoir:

“It was in the middle of the night on March 12th, a night where sleep wouldn’t come. I was lying in prayer and meditation, looking for some way to do something to help the patients I was seeing who were getting sick and dying from this new virulent form of disease. I decided to use this sleepless time to check my email. It was there that I found a message containing the link to a YouTube video that would forever change my life, and would, more importantly, save the lives of millions across the world.”

That night he built the protocol on the spot. Zinc. HCQ or quercetin or EGCG to drag the zinc inside the cell. Vitamin D, C, the whole cheap arsenal. No patents. No billion-dollar price tag. Just science that had been sitting in plain sight since 2010.

And here it is, the full Baric paper abstract, the one the machine buried while they raced to patent Remdesivir and mRNA shots:

Zn(2+) inhibits coronavirus and arterivirus RNA polymerase activity in vitro and zinc ionophores block the replication of these viruses in cell culture
Ralph S. Baric et al.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21079686/

“Increasing the intracellular Zn(2+) concentration with zinc-ionophores like pyrithione (PT) can efficiently impair the replication of a variety of RNA viruses, including poliovirus and influenza virus. For some viruses this effect has been attributed to interference with viral polyprotein processing. In this study we demonstrate that the combination of Zn(2+) and PT at low concentrations (2 µM Zn(2+) and 2 µM PT) inhibits the replication of SARS-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and equine arteritis virus (EAV) in cell culture. The RNA synthesis of these two distantly related nidoviruses is catalyzed by an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which is the core enzyme of their multiprotein replication and transcription complex (RTC). Using an activity assay for RTCs isolated from cells infected with SARS-CoV or EAV—thus eliminating the need for PT to transport Zn(2+) across the plasma membrane—we show that Zn(2+) efficiently inhibits the RNA-synthesizing activity of the RTCs of both viruses. Enzymatic studies using recombinant RdRps (SARS-CoV nsp12 and EAV nsp9) purified from E. coli subsequently revealed that Zn(2+) directly inhibited the in vitro activity of both nidovirus polymerases. More specifically, Zn(2+) was found to block the initiation step of EAV RNA synthesis, whereas in the case of the SARS-CoV RdRp elongation was inhibited and template binding reduced. By chelating Zn(2+) with MgEDTA, the inhibitory effect of the divalent cation could be reversed, which provides a novel experimental tool for in vitro studies of the molecular details of nidovirus replication and transcription.”

Read it again. Slowly. Baric, the guy who spent forty years engineering chimeric coronaviruses, the guy who worked with Wuhan, the guy whose department got paid by Fauci, published this in 2010. Zinc + ionophore stops the RdRp dead. Works on SARS. Works on arteriviruses. Works on polio, flu, everything that uses that same replication engine.

He never ran the animal trials. Never did the human ones. Just published it and moved on to the next patent goldmine.

Zev did the trials. In real time. On real people. High-risk patients. Eighty-four percent drop in hospitalizations. One death in the whole cohort and that was a late-stage cancer case. He treated Bolsonaro. He trained doctors in Honduras. He saved thousands while the machine screamed “dangerous!” and yanked his YouTube video and called him a quack on every screen in America.

By the time I finally got the message through in December 2021, Baric’s name attached to his own protocol, Zev’s mind lit up like a fuse. He saw the whole sick joke: the architect of the nightmare had also published the off-switch. (The full forensic breakdown of that moment, Zev’s own words from his memoir, how Baric’s 2010 paper became the Zelenko Protocol, and the original deep dive into that exact article are laid out raw in the Men In Black series and my CHRONOS piece: Baric’s “Zelenko” Protocol: Pt 4 and The article saying Zinc is effective against coronavirus is written by Ralph Baric in 2010.) Zev went on Dr. Drew and Sargis Sangari’s show and laid it out raw. He knew he was dying. He didn’t care. He just wanted the truth in the air.

Men In Black

Baric's "Zelenko" Protocol: Pt 4

Synopsis…

Read more

2 years ago · 13 likes · 10 comments · Reece and MacKenzie

“The Baric Files” revisits the pivotal role of Dr. Vladimir ‘Zev’ Zelenko in pioneering early treatments for COVID-19 with his protocol, based on Ralph Baric’s 2010 zinc-ionophore research. Zelenko’s journey, chronicled in his memoir “Zelenko: How to Decapitate the Serpent,” highlights the transformative moment when he stumbled upon Medcram Video Update #34, catalyzing his protocol’s creation.

Despite facing censorship and skepticism, Zelenko’s persistence led to a significant reduction in hospitalizations among high-risk patients. Unveiling Baric’s connection to the protocol adds a profound layer of understanding, raising ethical questions about Baric’s research priorities and highlighting the potential for natural prophylaxis and treatment options.

Zelenko’s legacy, marred by controversy and censorship, underscores the urgent need for transparency in scientific research and the pursuit of effective solutions against emerging viral threats like Disease X, while demanding accountability from institutions and leaders.

That 2022 Hantavirus transmission? Same fire. Ninety percent mortality in some strains. No approved treatment. Zev just says: single-stranded RNA. My protocol. Cheap oral approach. G-d bless you. The pharmabots flooded the comments like rats when the lights come on. Because they know what we know: if people figure out this works on any ssRNA virus Hantavirus, whatever “Disease X” they’re warming up next, the entire pandemic racket collapses. No more fear. No more forced shots. No more trillions in stolen wealth.

And right here, straight from Zev’s own site and his official protocol chart, the exact dosages, the exact breakdown, the exact weapons he handed the world before they tried to bury him. Prophylaxis for the worried. Full treatment for the sick. Low risk, high risk, moderate risk. OTC options in orange. Prescription where it counts. No middlemen. No mystery.

Read more

Subscribe now

We were somewhere around the edge of 2020 when the fear kicked in hard, the kind that doesn’t just rattle your cage but rewires the whole goddamn nervous system. The air itself felt thick with it, sticky, electric, crawling up the spine like bad acid mixed with pure bureaucratic venom. And right at the center of this rolling nightmare was the PCR test, that treacherous little bastard, cranked up to cycle thresholds so high it was practically hallucinating viruses in the dust on your bookshelf.

They called them “cases.” Sweet Jesus, what a word.

But the man who invented the fucking thing tried to scream the truth into the void before they even got the show on the road.

The Centerpiece: Kary Mullis, the Inventor Who Knew

Inventor of the PCR test, Dr. Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize-winning mad genius who built the machine that would later terrorize the planet, laid it out plain as day in one of his final interviews:

“With PCR, if you do it well, if you amplify one single molecule, you can find almost anything in anybody… It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick.”

He was Fauci’s most notable critic, the guy who called bullshit on the way PCR had been weaponized before, during the AIDS hysteria and he died suddenly on August 7, 2019. Just months before the pandemic script dropped. Convenient timing, right? The one voice that could have blown the whole diagnostic fraud wide open, silenced right before they needed a test that could turn a cold, a fruit, or a goat into a global crisis.

Watch the clip for yourself — Mullis sitting there calm as a bomb, hands gesturing like he’s explaining why the sky is blue while the rest of the world prepares to lose its mind:

They ignored him. They cranked the cycles to 35, 40, 45. And suddenly the world was drowning in “cases.”

A 2025 German lab study tore the mask off the fraud: only about 14% of those early PCR positives were real infections, real, antibody-producing, actual-virus business. The rest? Eighty-six percent ghosts. Phantom RNA fragments dancing in the machine at 35, 40, 45 cycles.

FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse)

BREAKING: 86% of PCR-Positive “COVID Cases” Were Not Real Infections

By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH…

Read more

8 months ago · 552 likes · 144 comments · Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Lockdowns, the six-foot holy decree, the mRNA salvation shots, they were all built on this house of statistical mirrors. The numbers lied so beautifully the whole world bowed down.

But the illusion ran deeper than just the tests. UK university modelers, most influentially at Imperial College, with Oxford offering a sharply dissenting counter-view, were busy peddling their shiny SIR compartmental models (Susceptible-Infected-Recovered or SRI variants in some of the academic fever dreams). Far from warning that raw “case” counts were a dangerous mirage, the dominant models churned out by Imperial made PCR positives the star of the show. They treated every positive swab as a potential catastrophe, projecting exponential explosions of infections that would overwhelm hospitals any day now. The models screamed that cases were the main thing to worry about, forget distinguishing them from actually sick people flooding the wards. Track the cases, fear the cases, lock down for the cases.

The machine didn’t just listen. It loved it. Instead it flipped the script into pure theater.

On the 16th of March 2020, a mathematical epidemiologist at Imperial College London named Neil Ferguson released a modelling paper that changed the world. His team’s computer simulation projected that, without government intervention, SARS-CoV-2 could kill more than 500,000 people in the United Kingdom and two million in the United States before the summer was out.

The Hospital Shell Game: Broken Bones, Car Crashes, and the Great COVID Overcount

While the models turned every PCR positive into a looming apocalypse, the bean-counters and hospital administrators erased any remaining line between cases and sickness. Any patient who tested positive, even if they were in for a broken hip, a heart attack, a car wreck, or stage-four cancer, got slapped with the COVID label. “With COVID” became “from COVID.” The 28-day rule in the UK meant if you died within a month of a positive test, bingo, official COVID death, regardless of what actually killed you.

Hospitals that looked eerily empty in the early waves (elective surgeries canceled, regular patients terrified away) suddenly reported sky-high “COVID hospitalizations.” The beds weren’t full of gasping pneumonia cases; they were full of people who happened to test positive while being treated for something else. The numbers had to be defended. The fear had to be fed. Empty wards became “overwhelmed COVID wards” on the evening news.

It was statistical necromancy on an industrial scale, turning everyday medical misery into pandemic fuel.

The Dubious Genesis: A Timeline That Defies Sanity

Read more

The Spark: Raoult’s “Day One” and Zelenko’s Outpatient Protocol (March–April 2020)

As laid out in “The Day Professor Raoult Knew COVID-19 Was Already Over”, Raoult’s team submitted their open-label study on March 16 and published March 20 in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. Twenty-six patients on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) + azithromycin showed rapid viral clearance—often in days. Raoult, one of the world’s top microbiologists and head of the IHU Méditerranée Infection, released results in real time, held press briefings, and treated queues of patients in Marseille.

Across the ocean, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko in Monroe, New York, risk-stratified high-risk outpatients with his triple therapy: low-dose HCQ + zinc + azithromycin. By late March he published an open letter and video detailing near-zero hospitalizations in hundreds of cases. Both were frontline clinical observations—cheap, repurposed, decentralized, and working.

The machine did not replicate. It contained.

The Propaganda Machinery Activates: The Trusted News Initiative – The Global Ministry of Truth

This was the Trusted News Initiative (TNI) and early public-private coordination ensuring uniform messaging. Dissenting doctors were isolated. The Milgram lever of authority—Fauci, WHO, national health ministers—was pulled hard.

“The sharing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media. Unfortunately, some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal lives and agenda, controlling exactly what people think. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.”

The Trusted News Initiative (TNI), simply Global Information Control, was founded in 2019 by the UK state broadcaster, the BBC, and its global media and tech partner. TNI claimed its first order of business was to promote freedom and democracy by preventing foreign interference in the 2020 US presidential elections. However, it seems that TNI’s big pharma backers had a vaccine agenda in mind from the start.

The TNI issued a warning in 2019 that anti-vaxxers were gaining traction across the internet, requiring algorithmic intervention – very smart computer programs – to identify, attack, and neutralize anti-vaccine content. How does it work? By flooding your screen with repetitive pro-vaccine messages that normalize the experimental vaccine, while demonizing the unvaccinated to create division and drive public acceptance of vaccine compliance.

The TNI also pays so-called fact-checkers to produce hit pieces on scientists and journalists who go against the official narrative. Hundreds of frontline medical professionals, scientists, and researchers who dare to speak out against the official narrative have disappeared from social media platforms at the hands of the TNI. They didn’t ask approved questions or come to approved conclusions, so now, doctors from Harvard, Stanford, and Oxford are considered dangerous experts who must be neutralized.

TNI director Jessica Cecile complains that anti-vaccine content often comes from people with degrees. There is often a grain of truth to what is claimed, making it difficult to untangle the falsehoods. They attack early treatment that could cure COVID-19 because it poses a threat to the vaccine agenda.

The TNI network also ignores stories of tens of thousands who have been injured by COVID-19 vaccines in order to promote the false narrative that they are safe and effective. It’s not just careers that the TNI is destroying, but real lives, as it suppresses the true numbers of vaccine adverse effects and early treatment protocols.

Who is paying for this harmful suppression of science? You are. We are. Taxpayers fund the governments, which in turn pay big pharma. Big pharma spends almost 7 billion dollars advertising with TNI corporations. TNI companies also have pharma investments, creating massive conflicts of interest. See how that works?

Read more

The Architecture of the Pandemic

My major ongoing series examining the full structure of the 2020–2023 response: ignored playbooks, suppressed treatments, power networks, and narrative control. Deep dives, timelines, and source packs released in serialized arcs.

Subscribe now

Clear & Present Danger

- Day One – March 3, 2020: When Didier Raoult Handed Us the Playbook They Ignored

Listen up, “you wide-eyed casualties still clawing your way out of the digital meat grinder”: this is CHRONOS, and this right here is where my personal red-onion journey began. Not some vague “I started paying attention in 2021” bullshit. No. For me it was March 3, 2020, 18:30. I was sitting in front of my screen when a friend sent me a video of Professor Didier Raoult, the old lion of infectious disease, head of the IHU Méditerranée Infection in Marseille is in front of his students laying it out raw.

He’s holding a paper fresh off the press from leading Chinese virologists (the same ones who regularly collaborated with him). They asked for his professional opinion on their head-to-head data: Remdesivir versus HCQ + azithromycin for treating SARS-CoV-2.

Raoult didn’t mince words. Remdesivir? Ineffective at the stage most patients were reaching hospital. The antiviral punch was already too late once viral load had peaked and the body was in recovery mode (what we’d later call Stage 4). Worse, the solvent used to deliver the drug hammered already-hypoxic kidneys, a lethal combo in reanimation wards.

HCQ, on the other hand? It had immunoregulatory properties that stopped the immune system from going nuclear and killing the patient with its own cytokine storm. Azithromycin cleared the secondary bacterial mess and helped with the lungs. This wasn’t prophylaxis yet, this was treatment for people already sick.

And that’s when the onion first peeled back for me. Because Raoult wasn’t guessing. The Chinese data (and the in-vitro work they’d already done) showed HCQ working exactly where the system later claimed nothing could.

Here’s the exact Chinese paper Raoult was referencing that day — the one the virologists sent him: Wang M, et al. “Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro.” Cell Research, 4 February 2020.

Read more

Subscribe now

Read more

Trump White House Control of Information During the Pandemic
Source: americanoversight.org

The virus came. Wuhan, late 2019. By January 2020 the signals were loud. The playbook sat on the shelf.

I have written here before about early treatments. Zinc and HCQ. Ralph Baric’s own 2010 paper. Ivermectin. The data that got buried. The doctors silenced. The narrative that locked down the world instead.

The Playbook demanded epidemiological assessment. Severity. Transmission. Availability of MCMs and NPIs. Page 32. Did they run the numbers on repurposed drugs? No. They dismissed hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin while pushing remdesivir. A drug with known kidney risks that became the standard.

Threat evaluation. Imminent or long-term? They treated it as both panic in public, business as usual in the labs.

Communication strategy. Clear public messaging. Instead, Fauci admitted the 6-foot rule “sort of just appeared.” No studies recalled. Masking for kids the same. “I don’t recall specifically.” Children lost speech development, learning. The studies came later. He had not followed them.

Surveillance and response planning. They had the capacity. They chose lockdowns over targeted protection. The elderly died in nursing homes while young people with near-zero risk were masked and isolated.

Trump stood with Fauci at the briefings. He let the man run the show. Operation Warp Speed delivered mRNA shots at record speed. Good for speed. Bad when it bypassed the law.

There is a federal statute. You cannot grant Emergency Use Authorization for a vaccine if any approved medication is shown effective against the disease. RFK Jr., now HHS Secretary, has said it plainly.

They knew about early treatments. My earlier pieces on Baric, HCQ-zinc ionophore effect, the collapsing narrative. The suppression was not accident. It kept the EUA door open. It kept the contracts flowing. It kept the fear high enough for mandates.

The Morens scandal. Fauci’s senior advisor, David Morens, indicted this week for destroying records, using personal email to dodge FOIA, conspiring to hide origins research. Back-channeling to protect the lab-leak truth. Fauci was the unnamed senior official in the mix. Then came the pardon. Full and unconditional. Autopen or not, it shields the man who led the response from any accounting.

Mistakes of the Trump administration, Fauci at the lead:

• Ignored the Obama-era Playbook’s decision rubrics for international and domestic response. No serious activation of the structured questions on MCMs. (Medical Countermeasures)

• Elevated Fauci and the public health bureaucracy over dissenting voices inside government and out.

• Allowed censorship of early treatment discussion on platforms, doctors, and journals. This directly contradicted the Playbook’s call for effective communication and evidence-based planning.

• Pushed lockdowns and school closures that the Playbook never prescribed as default. Targeted protection of the vulnerable was the logical path. They chose blanket fear.

• Fast-tracked mRNA under EUA while suppressing cheap, available options that could have broken the emergency justification.

• Failed to demand transparent origins investigation. The lab ties were known. The gain-of-function work at Wuhan. The playbook assumed coordination with WHO and others. They got stonewalled and accepted it.

• Let the narrative machine run unchecked. “Mistakes were made” became the shield. No one was held responsible in real time.

The playbook existed to prevent exactly this drift. It called for incident command, interagency consultation (DOS, HHS, DOD, CDC), risk evaluation based on data, not politics. They had the tool. They chose theater.

Read more

In 2020 he and Jean-Claude Perez had examined the SARS-CoV-2 genome. They found short sequences that looked like pieces from HIV and other retroviruses. They published their analysis. It was debated, attacked, and often dismissed. Montagnier stood by the work. He called the virus the job of professionals, not nature alone.

Subscribe now

Two years later, in the final weeks of his life, he turned to something else. He and Perez, with neurologist Claire Moret-Chalmin, studied cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) that appeared days after COVID-19 vaccination. The paper was nearly finished when he died. It came out posthumously in January 2023.

Luc Montagnier, Nobel-Winning Co-Discoverer of H.I.V., Dies at 89

He helped find the virus that causes AIDS, fell into a feud over it and later turned controversial, taking an anti-vaccine stance during the Covid-19 crisis.
Source: nytimes.com

The 2020 Work: HIV-like Inserts in SARS-CoV-2

Montagnier and Perez looked at the spike protein region. They reported unusual inserts. Some showed similarity to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag sequences. They argued the pattern was unlikely to be random. The paper appeared on preprint servers and later in other outlets. Critics said the similarities were short, common in nature, or statistically insignificant. Montagnier did not back down. He spoke plainly about laboratory origins.

The debate followed him. He kept working.

The Final Paper: Rapid-Onset CJD After Vaccination

The 2023 paper is titled “Emergence of a New Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease: 26 Cases of the Human Version of Mad-Cow Disease, Days After a COVID-19 Injection.” It was published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. Source:montagnier.net

The authors collected 26 cases diagnosed in 2021. Most patients received Pfizer or Moderna mRNA shots. First symptoms appeared on average 11.38 days after injection. Many were previously healthy. The disease moved fast. Twenty patients died. The rest were still alive at the time of writing but severely affected.

Typical sporadic CJD takes years to develop and months to kill. This version was different. Patients showed vertigo, paresthesia, fatigue, aphasia, gait problems, myoclonus, and rapid decline to akinetic mutism. MRI, EEG, and biomarkers matched CJD. The timing linked it to the shots.

Source:cureus.com

Here is the protocol Montagnier used and recommended for post-COVID care and related support, as shared in communications around that time:

Read more

Subscribe now

The email was simple. It carried the header “BOSTON UNIVERSITY CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED.” Morens sent it from his iPhone on April 21, 2021. He wrote to Peter Daszak and the others. He said there was no worry about FOIAs. He could send stuff to Tony on his private Gmail. Or hand it to him at work or at his house. Tony was too smart to let colleagues send him anything that could cause trouble. Tony was Fauci.

The indictment said this was no lone act. Morens, Daszak Co-Conspirator 1, head of EcoHealth Alliance and the rest used personal Gmail accounts. They hid talk about NIH grants and the Wuhan Institute of Virology project. They worked to get the grant back after it was cut. They traded letter drafts. They back-channeled information straight to Fauci.

They sent gifts. In June 2020 Daszak mailed two bottles of The Prisoner Red Napa Valley wine to Morens’s house in Maryland. The note said it was the first of more to come. Thanks for the advice and the behind-the-scenes shenanigans against the bosses. Morens wrote back. He said he would now have to do something to deserve it. He suggested a scientific commentary in a big medical journal. It would outline the importance of EcoHealth’s work.

Read more

Subscribe now

Source: Bill Gates and Dr. Fauci talk regularly

Bill Gates and Dr. Anthony Fauci, photographed walking together during high-level global-health discussions. Their partnership became the public face of a deeper alignment between private philanthropy and public policy.

Consider the architecture. Documents painstakingly assembled from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s own grant database reveal that, by 2021, the foundation had directed more than $319 million to media outlets worldwide from NPR and CNN to the BBC, The Guardian, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, and Al-Jazeera. The money was not given blindly; it was earmarked for “gender equality,” “education reform,” and “global development” issues close to the foundation’s heart and, by extension, to Gates’ vision of a data-driven, vaccine-centric future. As one investigative report noted at the time, the foundation’s grants raised “obvious conflict-of-interest questions” about journalistic independence.

This was no isolated philanthropy. Gates poured $1.27 billion into the United Nations Agenda 2030 Global Goals, the blueprint for a re-engineered planet. He has been a major funder of CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), which alone committed $54.3 million to clinical trials for Moderna’s new bird-flu mRNA vaccine, precisely the technology Gates has backed through earlier investments. He has also financed solar geoengineering research: experiments in blocking sunlight to cool the Earth, a planetary-scale intervention whose risks and ethics remain fiercely debated. These are not separate projects. They form a single operating system, one in which health, climate, media, and policy converge under the same financial architecture.

Read more

Fauci and the health institutions knew early treatments worked. That is exactly why they were systematically buried.

Subscribe now

Read more

Holy mother of bat guano. Anthony Fauci—America’s favorite little gnome of gain-of-function, the man who spent three years telling us to trust the science while the science was busy mutating in a Wuhan petri dish—had been pre-pardoned. Pre-pardoned! Like some kind of presidential golden parachute stitched together by the same invisible hands that once told us two weeks to flatten the curve would be enough. The federal government just handed him a “get out of accountability free” card while the rest of us are still choking on the ashes of destroyed lives, shuttered businesses, and experimental jabs that turned half the country into walking adverse-event reports.

Read more

Luc Montagnier (1932–2022) was a French virologist whose groundbreaking work on the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) earned him the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (shared with Françoise Barré-Sinoussi).

His career spanned decades at the Pasteur Institute, where he co-discovered HIV in 1983 as the causative agent of AIDS. Yet Montagnier’s legacy extends far beyond that triumph. In his later years, he fearlessly pursued uncomfortable truths—including what he described as the artificial insertion of HIV sequences into the SARS-CoV-2 genome—work that culminated in explosive collaborations and a posthumous scientific warning about COVID-19 vaccines and rapid-onset prion disease.

A Lifetime of Scientific Achievement

Born on August 18, 1932, in Chabris, France, Montagnier studied medicine and science at the Universities of Poitiers and Paris. He joined the Pasteur Institute in 1972 and rose to prominence through research on retroviruses and interferon. His team’s 1983 isolation of a novel retrovirus from patients with swollen lymph nodes—later named HIV—proved to be the breakthrough that explained the emerging AIDS epidemic.

Montagnier’s contributions included:

• Identifying HIV as a T-lymphotropic retrovirus.

• Developing early diagnostic tools and advancing understanding of the virus’s role in immune collapse.

• Founding the World Foundation for AIDS Research and Prevention.

These achievements earned him numerous honors, including the Louis-Jeantet Prize (1986), Japan Prize (1988), and the 2008 Nobel Prize.

Source: The Nobel Prize

The Bitter “Debacle” with Robert Gallo and the U.S. Response (Including Fauci)

The HIV discovery sparked one of science’s most acrimonious priority disputes. Montagnier’s French team published their findings in Science in May 1983. A year later, U.S. researcher Robert Gallo announced a similar virus (initially called HTLV-III), claiming it as his discovery. Investigations later revealed that Gallo’s samples were contaminated by the French isolate sent to his lab.

The U.S. government initially credited Gallo heavily, leading to lawsuits from the Pasteur Institute over patent rights for HIV antibody tests. A 1987 agreement between the U.S. and French governments shared credit, but tensions lingered. The 2008 Nobel Prize went only to Montagnier and Barré-Sinoussi—explicitly excluding Gallo—prompting renewed debate.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, then head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), publicly acknowledged that the French team isolated the virus first, while crediting Gallo’s lab with key work proving causation. The episode highlighted issues of scientific priority, intellectual property, and national prestige in high-stakes research. Montagnier maintained that his team deserved primary recognition, a stance later vindicated by genomic evidence of contamination.

The 2020 Interview: “HIV Sequences Were Inserted… Very Meticulous Work”

In April 2020, Montagnier appeared on French television (CNews) and made a statement that reverberated globally. He asserted that SARS-CoV-2 was not purely natural but contained inserted sequences from HIV—the very virus he had discovered decades earlier. He described the engineering as “very meticulous” work by molecular biologists, suggesting a lab origin (possibly accidental release from Wuhan).

Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winner for his research on HIV, claimed that HIV sequences were inserted into the COVID-19 virus, describing this work as highly meticulous.

This was not speculation in isolation. Montagnier collaborated with biomathematician Jean-Claude Pérez on detailed genomic analyses. Their 2020 papers (published on Zenodo and in peer-reviewed outlets) identified anomalous HIV-like RNA fragments in the SARS-CoV-2 genome—insertions absent in natural coronaviruses but present in the spike protein region.

Read more

Read more

Subscribe now

Source: Vanityfair.com

Reece’s work—detailed across his “The Baric Files” series and culminating in the book Protocol-Z (co-authored with Sami MacKenzie-Kerr and now available on Amazon)—reveals a story far bigger than one paper or one doctor.

PROTOCOL-Z: The Forbidden Cure
by Ronald Reece (Author), Sami MacKenzie-Kerr (Editor)

The book Protocol Z by author Ron Reece is now available on Amazon. In March 2020, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko developed the Zelenko Protocol, using Zinc and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to reduce hospitalizations by over 84% in high-risk COVID-19 patients. His findings, shared via a now-banned YouTube video and endorsed by then-President Trump, gained global attention but faced resistance from medical and political establishments. Unbeknownst to Zelenko, his protocol aligned with Dr. Ralph Baric’s 2010 research on Zinc-based broad-spectrum antivirals targeting RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase (RdRP), effective against RNA viruses like SARS-CoV-2 and potentially H5N1. A former intelligence analyst, the author connected Baric’s work to Zelenko’s protocol, developing PROTOCOL-Z, an all-natural alternative that reportedly defeats viral infections within 24 hours, raising questions about Baric’s dual role in antiviral and gain-of-function research.

In my own analysis, the story is far bigger than one paper or one doctor. It points to a dual-purpose biodefense project: offensive gain-of-function (GOF) research on coronaviruses, disguised as defensive vaccine development to circumvent international prohibitions on biological weapons research. When the engineered virus leaked, the mRNA injection campaign became the necessary cover story to justify the entire operation and shield those responsible.

Baric’s 2010 Breakthrough

- The Preventative Method Hiding in Plain Sight

In 2010, Ralph Baric—already a towering figure in coronavirus research and later a key collaborator with the Wuhan Institute of Virology—co-authored a landmark paper demonstrating that zinc, when delivered into cells via an ionophore like pyrithione (a natural extract from Persian shallots), potently inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP). This enzyme is the “replication engine” shared by all positive-strand RNA viruses, including SARS-CoV, influenza, polio, and the virus that would later be called SARS-CoV-2.The paper’s abstract is unambiguous:

“Increasing the intracellular Zn(2+) concentration with zinc-ionophores like pyrithione (PT) can efficiently impair the replication of a variety of RNA viruses… we demonstrate that the combination of Zn(2+) and PT at low concentrations inhibits the replication of SARS-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and equine arteritis virus (EAV) in cell culture… Zn(2+) directly inhibited the in vitro activity of both nidovirus polymerases.”

Full paper: PubMed – Zn²⁺ Inhibits Coronavirus and Arterivirus RNA Polymerase Activity In Vitro and Zinc Ionophores Block the Replication of These Viruses in Cell Culture
Baric’s team even showed the effect was reversible with a chelator, proving zinc was the active antiviral agent. This was not obscure lab curiosity. It was a roadmap for prophylaxis and early treatment: flood cells with zinc early, block viral replication before it explodes, and stop transmission. Yet for over a decade, this discovery sat largely ignored by mainstream medicine, until Reece connected the dots.

Ron Reece Makes the Connection

- From Baric’s Lab to Zelenko’s Front Lines

In March 2020, as COVID-19 raged, Dr. Zelenko—treating high-risk patients in New York—stumbled upon a MedCram video (Update #34) analyzing Baric’s work. Zelenko immediately adapted it: zinc sulfate + hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, a proven zinc ionophore) + azithromycin. His outpatient protocol slashed hospitalizations by 84% in high-risk cohorts and saved countless lives.

Reece, watching the same unfolding crisis, recognized the fingerprints of Baric’s 2010 research. In May 2020 he publicly pinned the connection on X (then Twitter): Baric’s zinc-ionophore mechanism was the scientific foundation of the Zelenko Protocol. Years later, after finally briefing Zelenko himself (who called it a “mind-blower”), Reece documented the full story in

Men In Black

Baric's Zinc Revelation: Part 1

Thanks!! This site is powered by Caffeine and Plasma rifles…

Read more

2 years ago · 16 likes · 1 comment · Reece and MacKenzie

The Baric Files and the book Protocol-Z is the definitive account. It lays out how zinc + natural ionophores (HCQ, EGCG from green tea, quercetin, or pyrithione) can disrupt RNA viral replication across all such pathogens—not just SARS-CoV-2. As Reece writes: “What if they held a pandemic and no one came?”

Read more

Subscribe now

Bob Moran didn't just draw the COVID era. He nailed it to the wall like a wanted poster in a Wild West saloon. Born into the quiet hills of Somerset, schooled at Wellington, graduated Falmouth in 2008, he was the kid who could caricature the fat kid in class and turn it into art. Youngest gun in the mainstream press – Telegraph weekend slot by 2011, after a quick spin at The Guardian. His ink flowed for the establishment: Morning Star, Conservative Woman, the whole circus. Awards piled up – Political Cartoon of the Year runner-up, Webby honoree, Cartoon Art Trust winner in 2017. Then 2015 hit, and he made Father's Days, that gut-punch animated short about his newborn daughter Poppy's brain damage at birth – hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, cerebral palsy, the works. Helpless dad in the NICU, watching the system chew up innocence. That was the seed, brother. The personal grenade that exploded when the lockdowns came.

Fast-forward to the plague year. The world lost its goddamn mind. Masks. Distancing. The jab – that sacred cow injected into billions. Moran? He never played along. Never masked. Never sanitized. Never scanned a QR code or lied to the NHS app. His conscience was a flamethrower. His cartoons became Molotovs lobbed at the fear machine: kids suffocating under cloth muzzles, economies as medieval quests through "Mountains of Toilet Roll," governments as bulldozers crushing "SAVE LIVES" signs while the elite played god. He called the mass vax rollout what it was – the worst pharmaceutical experiment in human history. "The mass injecting of more than half the world's population with that drug is the worst thing that has ever happened in the history of our species," he snarled in one of those viral rants that lit the fuse.

And the drawings? Pure visual napalm. Look at this one – the "Roadmap to Exiting Lockdown" from the Telegraph days, a twisted D&D map of Boris Johnson's clown show: Sea of Despair, Forbidden Forest of drones, the Hair Wizard, the sleeping bear of the economy you had to awaken with a horn of commerce. It was satire as prophecy, mocking the absurdity while the body count of collateral damage – kids, the vulnerable, the mentally wrecked – stacked up like cordwood.

Read more

Subscribe now

Read more

Subscribe now

Read more